Monday, February 26, 2007


Yet another hypothesis on the story of Christ and what may or may not have transpired in his life. This story, which by the sounds of it already has the Vatican and various others up in arms and angrily denouncing it before it even airs.

Take a pill people! One would think that with such visceral and denouncing statements people come forward with as soon as a theory like "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" or the "Da Vinci Code " movie (poorly done I thought) roughly pertaining to it comes out, that there was something to hide in the first place.

Not being one of the mainstream Christian faith to begin with, I fail to see what all the kerfuffle is about. It is indeed quite plausible when one looks at the history, that Christ *could* have married, had a family etc. So what? Yeah I know it would turn mainstream christianity on it's ear and all that, but that doesn't really bother me.

I've always been rather fascinated that people could (supposedly) base their life on the writings of others from centuries ago, be it from a mish-mash of writings from numerous scholars and relatively unknown authors or the supposed ramblings of an arab thug.

Lighten up people, its just a hypothesis for christ's sake! (oops!) the halls of Valhalla, where the brave shall live forever!


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home